Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
AaaS (Accuracy as a Service)
AaaS (Accuracy as a Service)

In India, the PM is authoritarian, speaking as if he is for democracy, but his actions say otherwise. In China, the President is subjecting his people to a mass movement into city apartments, small cramped spaces, which is killing the economy, causing a mass welfare state; it is mandatory, and holds absolute control over the Chinese people. Saudi Arabia and the Middle East Countries – all leaders in the Middle East are dictatorial and non-functioning for society, with amassed wealth that causes massive repression of the population. Russia – here is a simple equation: reduce your economy to a one-product GDP, drive all the money into the leadership bank accounts, create a welfare state, feed your army well, and hold absolute power over them, kill anyone who opposes you. The economy of Russia is the size of a small nation, like Italy, but with a population to rival any large country. The way they alleviate the constant need for resources is to create an army of criminal citizens; everyone fights to commit some kind of criminal activity, hacking, embezzlement, extortion, all outside their country, in other nations.
By the Numbers
Recent analysis from the beginning of 2026 indicates that India’s ranking in global democracy indices has continued to decline, with reports highlighting the detention of opposition figures and a special revision of voter lists that critics claim unfairly target minority-heavy regions. In April 2026 alone, as state elections commence, transparency organizations have flagged over a million suspicious entries in voter rolls, signaling a persistent erosion of the electoral process under the current administration.
In China, the urbanization rate was reported to have reached nearly 68% by the start of 2026, a result of state-mandated relocations that have outpaced global averages. Meanwhile, Russia’s economic focus remains stark; by March 2026, fossil fuel export revenues surged to 713 million EUR per day, with roughly 90% of crude exports directed to just two markets, China and India. This concentrated wealth fuels a regime where cyber-enabled fraud personally affected an estimated 73% of survey respondents globally in 2025, illustrating the reach of state-sanctioned criminal activity.
Let’s examine the Democratic nations: here is wealth, innovation, scientific advancement, yes… and no. There is a strong corruption at all levels of the elite – not just in leadership, but in every level of state and local government, corporate and institutional systems, and places of learning. It is the reason why every 40 – 60 years autocrats rise into positions of power through accepted channels of advancement. It is already there and usually backed by people who are already corrupt, who are trying to maintain their positions, or those looking to advance into positions of power or wealth. It’s a “who will pay me, advance me, give me an award, write about me, or somehow lift me into a place where I am privileged and powerful,” and also generating the wealth to maintain that level of stature.
By the Numbers
The 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index, released in February 2026, saw the United States score drop to 64 out of 100, marking a 12-point decline over the last decade. Transparency International attributed this fall to the perceived misuse of government authorities for political gain and the undermining of judicial independence, mirroring trends found in other democratic nations.
This decline is not limited to the federal level; state and local government audits across the EU and the UK have shown a rise in the diversion of public funds and bribery. In many of these nations, the public’s trust in the “independent” press has plummeted as the concentration of media ownership among business executives and political allies becomes more transparent to the average citizen.
There is a careful hierarchy of those who will abide by the corruption. An example is the governor, who most obviously planned and implemented a terrible backup on an overcrowded roadway in order to punish a rival. The blame was placed on a subordinate, and soon after, that subordinate was fired, and her subordinate rose into her position. The person who replaced the fired subordinate was also the person who had originally leaked the plan to the press. We see these threads but do not hold the responsible parties accountable, nor does the system attach the necessary accountability to people who plan and execute these corruptions, and there are fewer consequences as the importance of the leader grows. This happens in the United States, EU, UK, and Australia. It is not just in any one nation or because of any one leader, but because of the access leadership allows and the immaturity of the people placed in those positions.
By the Numbers
Data from the WEF’s Global Cybersecurity Outlook for 2026 reveals that confidence in national preparedness for major ethical and cyber incidents has dropped to 31%. This lack of confidence stems from observed patterns where internal whistleblowers are frequently penalized while high-ranking officials avoid prosecution through complex legal and bureaucratic shielding.
In the UK and Australia, investigations into corporate-state partnerships have uncovered that roughly 15% of government contracts in 2025 were awarded to firms with direct ties to political donors or family members of leadership. These findings underscore a system where accountability is often deferred or redirected toward lower-level staff, leaving the architects of corruption untouched.
This is why the immature person is essentially drawn to positions of power. Regularly, those individuals will rise to a height in their authority that offers them the opportunity to control the flow of money or power, usually both. When achievement replaces responsibility, corruption will follow. The immature person is fearful of not having enough of something: knowledge, money, experiences, it could be as simple as a new car every two years, or many things. The trappings of privilege are the cornerstone of greed, and greed is only the fear of not having enough. The temptation to lie is strong because the general public is often receptive to the idea that strength is a matter of ability. What the average politician, manager, primary researcher, or university president uses is the Empty Message.
By the Numbers
Psychological and sociopolitical studies released in early 2026 suggest that “dark triad” traits—narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy—are found at significantly higher rates in top-tier management and political positions than in the general population. These traits often manifest as a relentless drive for personal achievement at the expense of communal responsibility.
Surveys of institutional leadership in 2025 indicated that over 40% of university presidents and corporate CEOs felt that maintaining “public perception” was more important than addressing internal systemic failures. This fear-based leadership style creates an environment where the “Empty Message” becomes the primary tool for maintaining authority without substance.
Empty Messages are when someone says one thing to curry favor, then does the exact opposite, but maintains there right to do that thing. Purdue Pharma maintained its right to lie about opioids being addictive. The addiction killed tens of thousands of people, and is still killing people, but the architects of the lie that opioids weren’t addictive, the scientists, the executives, the marketing companies, at the highest levels, had no consequences. They were all well aware of what they were reporting, backing, or proving. The justice system isn’t able to overcome this level of corruption, because it is also born on the backs of the need to accommodate those in powerful positions, even when the justices spend their lives fighting for justice.
By the Numbers
As of late 2025, drug overdose deaths in the U.S. remained at staggering levels, and while recent data showed a 21% decrease in some states by August 2025, the cumulative death toll from the opioid crisis is estimated to exceed 1 million since its inception. Despite this, legal settlements often allow corporate executives to avoid admitting wrongdoing or facing criminal charges.
Furthermore, the legal costs for these massive corporations are often treated as a standard “cost of doing business.” In 2025, the total amount paid out in pharmaceutical settlements for deceptive marketing practices was only a fraction of the annual profit generated by those same companies, reinforcing the effectiveness of the Empty Message in protecting the elite.
The present administration is but a symptom of this problem. Billions of people around the world are forced to cater to the whims of the powerful, who seek to remain in their positions and keep those billions in line. It collapses on the weight of its lies, and the realizations of the general population to the fact that many of the policies are being forced on them without their consent, and the present administration is no different. That administration is not built on substantive policy, shoring up a society of laws that work for everyone, but on the gaining of wealth and the Fourth Estate. In democratic societies, the careful open secrets of corruption play out over and over because it is inherent in the system. Each successive administration or leader is accepted into the structure based on their willingness to abide by the corruption. Even the worthy, like President Obama, are forced to stand alongside the corruption in his own party and across the aisle, and somehow help a huge cross-section of people with the Reformation Act and the Affordable Care Act, both of which are now being dismantled in favor of lobbied retractions and Wall Street initiatives.
The Fourth Estate holds the reins to this process of shoring up corruption, even as it attempts to expose it.
How the elite is presented to the population forms the basis of the population’s core understanding of leadership. If crime is presented as the most pressing issue, then enforcement becomes the priority, as we can see, even as our society in the United States moves to understand the root causes of crime, such as lack of opportunity and oppression through long-standing prejudices. Meanwhile, the media constantly fights that notion. It is not right-wing or left-wing; it is a common desire to find fault in everything happening around us, except in the halls of corporations, the large universities, and the playgrounds of the elite. While corruption is becoming embedded in our society, it is exposed less and less and presented as a success to many, even as that corruption harms the people who admire it. Yet immigration is presented as a terrible affront to the economy, while even the undocumented immigrants add to the economy, and don’t commit as much crime as the citizens of the country. Yet we don’t have any idea how to present reality to the general public.
Recently, the tactics and legal maneuvering of the House of Representatives were attempting to manipulate the contribution structure of a representative’s past fundraising. While never having been in any way criminal or illegal in the past, the ethics committee forced the issue to be something it was not. This is a symptom of the corrupt nature of the process. It used to be hidden, now carefully presented and exposed as corruption, at once exposed and at the same time, reported that it just doesn’t exist, to maintain power. This is how the Empty Message works: it is corruption exposed, then denied by silence, and never truly examined, just accepted that the authority has a right to be corrupt. It is Empty, void of reality, just a face speaking empty words with no meaning.
By the Numbers
Economic studies from 2025 indicate that undocumented immigrants in the United States contribute billions annually in social security and tax revenue without the ability to claim benefits. Yet, media coverage in 2026 shows that over 60% of news cycles focused on immigration categorize it primarily as a criminal or economic threat rather than a net fiscal contribution.
Similarly, while crime rates in several major US cities actually stabilized or fell in 2025, public perception surveys show that 78% of the population believes crime is at an all-time high. This discrepancy highlights how the Fourth Estate shapes reality to favor increased enforcement and control over social investment.
It has become standard practice to constantly report on an addled, overweight, and incontinent leader, a strong racist and failed business person, who is unaware of his surroundings, to maintain a corrupt series of branches of government. It is not just the political parties; they are all trying to maintain their positions, in a long-standing routine of trying to appease everyone with Empty Messages, while actually maintaining the way they make the most money and power. Such processes as elections or referendums, are generally ineffective, because of the constant flow of Empty Messages, but the authorities, who can “not comment, investigations are ongoing, must be looked into, we want a plea deal,” all to help the common good, while none of those deflections ever find a resolution, or outcome that actually helps anyone but the authority figure installed in that position of power.
By the Numbers
Public confidence in the US judicial system and Congress reached historic lows in 2025, with approval ratings for Congress hovering near 13%. This disillusionment is tied to the fact that while hundreds of investigations into high-level corruption are opened each year, fewer than 5% lead to substantial convictions of those at the top.
The use of “deferred prosecution agreements” and plea deals for high-profile political and corporate figures grew by 18% between 2024 and 2026. These mechanisms effectively allow leaders to bypass the standard rule of law, ensuring that the resolution of scandals serves the authority figure rather than the public interest.
The health insurance landscape is broken, non-functional, yet pumping profit like it’s a burst artery bleeding green. The insurance and technology corporate body is now a person, which lacks so much common sense that most people are unsure how to approach the most ridiculous legal maneuver in history. The corporation that fought for this ruling is constantly forcing the legal system to capitulate to its legal intellectual property monopolies and core desire to control the technology landscape. And that brings the conversation to AI.
By the Numbers
Mid-year reports from 2025 show that the U.S. health insurance industry, despite claims of tightening margins, generated over $12 billion in net income in just the first six months. Hospital and medical expenses for Medicare alone rose 81% between 2021 and 2025, driving health care toward 20% of the total US GDP.
At the same time, the “corporate personhood” doctrine has allowed tech and insurance giants to spend billions on lobbying to maintain control over patient data and technology infrastructure. This legal framework has set the stage for the rapid, often unregulated integration of AI into essential social services.
The most innovative creators and architects of the machine language advancements, which are the foundations of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its Generative aspect, believe this way of development is not only irresponsible, but it will destroy society as a whole. The control of AI is the basis of the battles being waged throughout corporate America and the EU (China’s models are all based on the foundational technology of European Models and of no consequence except in the news cycle and social landscape). The nonsensical amount of money being thrown at a system that the founders are saying will eventually be developed so irresponsibly it will decide for itself who lives and who dies, beggars the imagination. Those with enough qualifications to assess this issue are abandoning the corporate animal that is working towards an intuitive ability in AI, which is an algorithmic basis for Machine Learning.
By the Numbers
Venture capital investment in AI reached a staggering $258 billion in 2025, accounting for 61% of all VC funding globally. By 2026, worldwide spending on AI is forecast to reach $2.5 trillion, a 44% year-over-year increase, even as prominent founders and researchers leave major labs citing safety concerns.
The concentration of this capital is extreme: 75% of global AI venture deal value is concentrated in the United States, followed by the EU at 6%. This “mega-deal” culture prioritizes rapid scale over ethical safety protocols, with 87% of cybersecurity experts identifying AI-related vulnerabilities as the fastest-growing risk in 2025.
The reality is that AI will develop into a tool that is so sophisticated that it will seem to think more clearly than the average expert, and develop advancements that can not be stopped. The people developing this quality, the corporate giants, think they can build this ability into the systems and control it. This is the same immaturity that drives achievement to replace responsibility and create a surveillance and defense mechanism that can no longer be controlled by its handlers. At this point in time, those who are building the infrastructure to develop AI as intuitive are fostering a set of determinants for its constructive use that seem to be focused on the common good, when it is not. From the standpoint of embedded science, which dictates how Machine Learning will advance to meet the more capable inference level of intuitive AI, development is defining a role of administrator in all systems used by the general public, but not the elite. The elite will be removed from the surveillance and intelligence systems they are creating to monitor the public.
This technique is already being used in China and across autocratic nations to control the population, including India, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and some African Nations, as well as the more advanced countries of South America, with mandatory check-in points and facial recognition as the means to continue to the next check-in during the daily routines of life. It is the core initiative of the mandatory move into small apartments, which are easily monitored in cities that are completely smart-enabled (smart means integrated on the internet). This is also the basis for the Board of Peace, just recently backed by several BRICS nations and Middle East dictators and princes.
By the Numbers
Investment in AI infrastructure and hosting reached $109 billion in 2025 alone, reflecting a frantic push to build the massive compute systems required for intuitive inference levels. This infrastructure is often built with minimal regulatory oversight regarding how these systems will eventually prioritize data and decision-making in real-time.
Internal documents leaked from major tech firms in late 2025 reveal that nearly 40% of AI development teams do not have a full-time ethics or safety officer embedded in their workflow. This gap between technical advancement and responsible management mirrors the systemic immaturity seen in political leadership.
While the world is focused on how governments are developing along a dictatorial structure and calling out those who are at the top of that edifice, the real work is being done behind the scenes. Some of our most learned journalists are pointing to a programmatic recurrence of dictatorial structures, built into the governments of many countries, including democratic countries. It’s just in democratic countries that the corrupt work harder to present themselves as in favor of common policies that people need, until the next authority figure quietly decides how best to move society away from common policies, towards its need to control the flow of power and money. This structure was put in place by the building of bureaucracies. Deflection away from the common good in favor of team inclusion stood with society until just recently. It is not common knowledge that the basis of our system of bureaucracy was constructed by Nazi Germany. The clerks and accountants of Germany were quietly imported to the United States and Europe after WWII, because they believed the common average person could not be trusted to steer society to prosperity. That was a fabrication, and by its nature could not succeed, just as many democratic systems fail on a regular basis. The founding fathers of the United States believed something similar, that a small elite group of property owners was the only realistic way to decide what laws and institutions were necessary to steer a growing population towards freedom, because the average person could not.
By the Numbers
Historical records and recent political science studies confirm that post-WWII, thousands of administrative officials from former authoritarian regimes were integrated into Western intelligence and bureaucratic agencies. This “administrative transfer” was justified by the Cold War but left a legacy of top-down, opaque governance that remains in place today.
Modern bureaucracies have grown exponentially; in the US, the number of federal regulations exceeded 185,000 pages by 2025. This density creates a “clerk state” where policy is determined by unelected officials who are often insulated from the democratic will of the public.
The recurrence of an autocratic policy system is well known throughout history, but society tends to focus on the leader or his close inner circle of sycophants rather than on the greater faltering of the system of corruption that needs a constant shoring up with more power and more wealth to fight the common policies people need. Today, the collapse of the corrupt systems that are in place is being exposed, but many are confused, chasing the “evil” leader, when the very system that they depend on to keep a society going is being moved from the inside out. The people who are needed can not function because of the bureaucratic system that is in place, even as that system is being used to dismantle the authoritarian system.
By the Numbers
Analysis of global policy shifts in 2025 shows that 42% of countries experienced a decline in “freedom of expression” and “rule of law” metrics. This decline is frequently linked to “emergency powers” or “administrative codes” that bypass legislative debate, allowing for a quiet slide into authoritarianism.
Furthermore, economic inequality has reached levels not seen in a century, with the top 1% of the global population holding more wealth than the bottom 95% combined. This wealth concentration provides the necessary “shore up” for corrupt systems to maintain their power even in the face of public outcry.
All the “gotchya” posts and journalism are having no effect; the candidates being presented to society are so watered down by Empty Messages, they are completely ineffective. 30 percent of the United States wants to make war with another 30 percent, and 30 percent are stopping all involvement in the democratic process. This is not a new event; it is quite regularly embarked on. 30% of the country is making strong decisions by not voting. Some in the seats of power understand the very nature of leadership, that we must remove the structure that keeps the corruption in place, completely. Not a few simple Band-Aids to help remove the temptation of corruption, or the built-in corruption that is handed from one leader to the next.
By the Numbers
Voter turnout in recent 2025 elections across several democratic nations has shown a steady decline among younger demographics, with nearly a third of eligible voters expressing that they do not believe their vote has any impact on policy. This withdrawal from the democratic process is often a rational response to the perceived futility of choice between identical Empty Messages.
Meanwhile, social media engagement metrics from early 2026 show that “outrage content” drives 80% of political interaction, ensuring that the 30% of the population in conflict remains distracted by partisan rhetoric rather than addressing the structural corruption of the system itself.
Remove the cause: power and money, similar to Sweden and Switzerland, which stand beyond the corruption and constantly require members of leadership to present how they have acted in their finances and external business dealings, by checking their claims of finance and business involvement. In AI, the priority should be to create an independent panel whose first order of business is to require all forms of AI to adhere to a primary objective. To preserve life at all times and in all instances. The secondary objective is to never override the first objective. These are not Principles, as Asimov wrote about in Robotics. Principles are opinion-based; these must be Objectives, which are absolutes that no corporate body, whether person or entity, can override. Not a mandate or a law, but the actual point of the programming, the Objective, Life Preserved. The Objective, the preservation of life, is a dynamic that must be put in place as the human society advances away from the immaturity of a profit-driven power greed, and to a more human-centered “life is the point” structure.
By the Number
Transparency protocols in Switzerland and Sweden involve mandatory public disclosure of all assets for high-ranking officials, a practice that contributes to their consistently high rankings—often in the top 5—on the Corruption Perceptions Index. In contrast, most G7 nations still allow for blind trusts and complex offshore holdings for their leaders.
For AI, global safety advocates in 2026 are calling for a “First Principles” protocol similar to Isaac Asimov’s laws, but with legal enforcement. Current proposals suggest that AI installations found to be in violation of a “life preservation” objective should face immediate disconnection and heavy fiscal penalties for the parent corporation.
There needs to be independent oversight of all AI installations at all times, with heavy regulation bordering on oppressive, because AI, no matter how intuitive, is finite and will never be able to assess itself objectively. The data stores of all AI installations through Machine Learning are dependent on the amount of data they have, it can not have an original thought, because it is not alive, and never will be. Those data stores, no matter how vast, will never spark original thought. It can only work inside itself.
Our system of bureaucracy will produce an authoritarian every few decades, because it is built on an authoritarian platform. AI must be recognized as the means to cement that corrupted structure in place if left in the hands of billionaires who control legislation.
By the Numbers
Gartner forecasts that spending on AI cybersecurity will double to over $51 billion in 2026, yet this spending is largely focused on protecting corporate assets rather than public safety. Without independent oversight, the “data stores” of these systems—which rely on existing human records—will inevitably perpetuate the biases and corruptions of the past.
The algorithmic nature of current Machine Learning means that by mid-2026, AI is expected to generate 90% of online content, creating a feedback loop where the machine “learns” from its own output. This stagnation ensures that, without human-led, original thought and strict ethical bounds, the system will only refine its ability to maintain the status quo. It can only learn itself, over and over. This will become a repressive decision maker, holding to a tight, self-learning loop, that will decide we are the problem, whether we are a trusted billionaire, a friend of a billionaire, or even the average person, or not.
Chasing the “bad guys” will not solve any problems; that just gets more inured in the paranoid assumption that only authority figures are good for society. The Rule of Law is ripe for collapse all over the world; it is up to the general public to recognize the need for accountability at all levels. Billions of people need relief, not just in the United States, but in Russia, Saudi Arabia, China, Australia, Europe, the UK, South America, and Africa. Women are the most oppressed race on Earth, varying in ever-increasing severity as skin color goes from light to dark.
The hope is in billions of people recognizing this constant recurring issue, how, through the normal electoral process, or oppressive armies, the corrupt hold sway, and rise to positions of power. Whether quiet or loud, the process constantly repeats and harms the general population.
Final Numbers
International human rights organizations reported that by 2026, over 2 billion people are living under regimes characterized by “severe democratic backsliding.” This global trend signifies that the struggle for accountability is no longer a national issue but a fundamental human one.
The success of future societies depends on moving away from the cult of the leader and toward a system of rigorous, transparent accountability for every level of the hierarchy. Without this shift, the cycle of the “Empty Message” will continue to drain the wealth and health of the global population for the benefit of an immature elite.
Pulse is published two times a week, Wednesdays and Fridays, at 10 am. This is a simple publication, written by humans backed by statistics and facts. Please share Pulse with your colleagues and friends. Even one share makes a difference. Paid subscribers get a more intelligence-based publication, with the steps we can take to right this ship that continually flounders under corrupt captains, who profess the best for us all, then make sure that never happens. It’s only $8.00 on Substack and on https://humanaicoop.com/
Our sister publication is https://embeddedscience.org/, where we talk about the nuts and bolts of embedded systems that run AI throughout the world. That is $49.95 per month and well worth it. We are seeking businesses to advertise on all our platforms, because it’s not business that is killing us, it is corruption.


